Re: [squid-users] Denying write access to the cache

On 3/26/07, James Sutherland <J.A.Sutherland@dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
> LFUDA should be a close approximation to the result the original
> poster
> wanted: anything getting hit only by a robot will still not be
> 'frequently'
> used, so although it will be cached initially, it will soon be evicted
> again.

Yes, it's a nice idea too. I didn't benchmark the different policies
but it seems to be a good choice anyway from the papers I've read.

Thanks for the idea.

--
Guillaume