tor 2007-02-01 klockan 12:00 -0200 skrev Michel Santos:
> depends how you look at it
> disk space is cheap and serving one 650MB object is a fat win even if it
> happens only twice a month
The only problem is that the bigger cache the more memory you may need
as there is an almost direct relation between the memory usage of Squid
and the amount of objects in your cache.
Allowing bigger objects helps reducing the memory usage, but at the same
time there is nothing which guarantees there will be bigger objects
cached so memory calculation needs to take this into account..
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MST