tis 2006-09-12 klockan 17:16 +0300 skrev Anton Glinkov:
> when using aufs the store rebuilding is done MUCH faster compared to
> diskd. But when using diskd, once the store is rebuilt the load average is
> always lower than 1. With aufs it is usually above 2.
And? It's quite natural given what "load average" represents (number of
processes/threads in RUN or IOWAIT state).. For your own sanity it's
best to ignore that metric as it's rarely of any use.
> The CPU time is done mostly by iowait.
Good. What aufs is there for absorbing.
> So which one should i use?
aufs.
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT