On 09.08.06 10:02, Alejandro Decchi wrote:
> Hello Squid- Users Someone implement squid-cache with active directory of
> windows 2003 and Ldap ???? I am using Debain Sarge I am trying with ntlm
> but still continue without results.
Whast does to do with disk partitions?
Nothing! Please don't mix threads, and when you want to ask new question,
send a new post.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
> To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] squid use entire disk partition
>
>
> On 09.08.06 16:30, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, huang mingyou wrote:
> > > The disk size is 6G,and I format it as ext3,so have 5.6G free space can
> > > use. and I set the cache_swap_low to 93
> >
> > Ah, well, if the disk is that small then you're going to need more 'free'
> > room
> > or the disk performance will suffer. So yes, you'd have to use ~50% of
> > that
> > (ie, 2600 megabytes ish) as your cache_dir size.
>
> I use "cache_dir /path/ 30000" on 36 GB drives and "cache_dir /path/ 15000"
> on 18GB drives. The filesystems are filled to ~86% which is OK, when I tried
> to use them a bit more, the performance degraded.
>
> I would try "cache_dir /path/ 5000" on that 5GB drive. If it would be to
> slow, I'd degrade it to 4500 to see if it helps.
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them,
> One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them
-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. - Holmes, what kind of school did you study to be a detective? - Elementary, Watson.Received on Wed Aug 09 2006 - 09:18:55 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Sep 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT