Visolve Squid wrote:
> Linda W wrote:
>> 2 TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200
> *TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS* - The object was believed to be in the cache, but
> could not be accessed.
--- Does this mean the cache index is out of sync with the cache contents, or is there another interpretation? I wouldn't expect this should occur that often. I'm guessing this could indicate a partially corrupt cache? Could be caused by a previous crash or a cache manager bug sometime in the past? Are there other possibilities (excluding deliberate tampering)? thanks, LindaReceived on Sat Jul 22 2006 - 20:45:39 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Aug 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT