Re: [squid-users] Re: SARG

From: S.M.H. Hamidi <hosseinhamidi@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:47:52 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Nima,

 Which version of SARG do you use? Upgrade your SARG
to latest version. Some older versions have such bug.

Regards,

--- nima sadeghian <sadegian@gmail.com> wrote:

> the cpu is 3.0 and free hard space is about 100GB.
> very strange. I
> used it in GNOME. could graphical interface effect
> the proficiancy?
> thnx
> nima
>
> On 5/31/06, Shoebottom, Bryan
> <BShoebottom@fanshawec.ca> wrote:
> > I agree, with ~5000 users we process a 1.5GB file
> nightly and it only
> > takes about 30minutes. The system is a dual
> 3.6GHz.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bryan
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:jgauthier@lastar.com]
> > Sent: May 31, 2006 9:12 AM
> > To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> > Subject: RE: [squid-users] SARG
> >
> > > Hi friends
> > > my SARG is too slow. I run squid for 400 users
> here, and a
> > > log file about 200MB. after one night SARG is
> runnig and
> > > donot want to give me report . is this ok?
> > > How can I change it more quick?
> >
> > After 1 month my access.log is 1G in size. It only
> takes a little while.
> > This may be disk or CPU based issues. But I would
> check with the SARG
> > lists/maintainers.
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> NIMA SADEGHIAN
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Wed May 31 2006 - 23:48:34 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 12:00:02 MDT