Before compiling squid, try changing the value of the __FD_SETSIZE in
the /usr/include/bits/typesizes.h file as
#define __FD_SETSIZE 8192
and then in the shell prompt
ulimit -HSn 8192
and try
echo 1024 32768 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
then compile and install squid
This should help you out with the file descriptor problem.
Thanks,
-Squid Runner Support
On 2/23/06, Gix, Lilian (CI/OSR) * <Lilian.Gix@boschrexroth.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I always had some problems with Filedescriptor.
> One day, U changed my Linux version to a Debian (I don't now if it's the
> reason) and I update Squid. And since, I got a configuration file under:
> /etc/default/squid
> On this file, there is:
>
> #
> # /etc/default/squid Configuration settings for the Squid
> proxy server.
> #
>
> # Max. number of filedescriptors to use. You can increase this
> on a busy
> # cache to a maximum of (currently) 4096 filedescriptors.
> Default is 1024.
> SQUID_MAXFD=4096
>
> I don't know if this can help....
>
> Gix Lilian
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Elsen [mailto:mark.elsen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 09:26
> To: Gregori Parker
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] FILE DESCRIPTORS
>
> > Sorry to be pounding the list lately, but I'm about to lose it with
> > these file descriptors...
> >
> > I've done everything I have read about to increase file descriptors on
> > my caching box, and now I just rebuilt a fresh clean squid. Before I
> > ran configure, I did ulimit -HSn 8192, and I noticed that while
> > configuring it said "Checking File Descriptors... 8192". I even
> > double-checked autoconf.h and saw #define SQUID_MAXFD 8192. I thought
> > everything was good, even ran a "ulimit -n" right before starting
> squid
> > and saw 8192! So I start her up, and in cache.log I see...
> >
> > 2006/02/22 19:05:08| Starting Squid Cache version 2.5.STABLE12 for
> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu...
> > 2006/02/22 19:05:08| Process ID 3657
> > 2006/02/22 19:05:08| With 1024 file descriptors available
> >
>
> To make sure that this is not bogus w.r.t. the real available amount of
> FD's : do you still get warnings in cache.log about FD-shortage when
> reaching the 1024 (bogus-reported ?) limit.
>
> The reason I ask is, that I have been playing with the FAQ guidelines
> too,
> ultimately getting the same result (stuck?) as you did.
>
> M.
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 23 2006 - 07:05:38 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 12:00:04 MST