Re: [squid-users] Squid and Subversion

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:38:45 +0100

ons 2006-02-15 klockan 19:08 +0100 skrev Maciej Zięba:
> * Here are a couple of last lines from cache.log
>
> 2006/02/15 13:52:02| WARNING: Forwarding loop detected for:
> Client: 127.0.0.1 http_port: 127.0.0.1:80
> REPORT http://xxx:81/svn/SwordFish/Trunk/SwordFish/SwordSite HTTP/1.0
> Host: xxx
> User-Agent: SVN/1.2.1 (r15230) neon/0.24.7
> Content-Length: 109
> Content-Type: text/xml
> Accept-Encoding: gzip
> Accept-Encoding: gzip
> Via: 1.1 xxx:80 (squid/2.5.STABLE11)
> X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
> Cache-Control: max-age=259200
> Connection: keep-alive
>

The above is the key to this mystery.

The request got denied because your Squid was talking to itself and
obviously something had gone wrong.

Now the question to ask is why did Squid talk to itself on this request?

any cache_peer lines in your squid.conf?

What port are Squid running on?

Can you please switch back to the native access.log format. This
provides more useable information in diagnosing problems like this..

It is NOT an access control problem even if it may look so from the erro
code returned.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 06:07:11 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MST