RE: [squid-users] HTTPD reverse proxy

From: M Harrata <mohamed.harrata@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:39:29 +0200

Joost,
If it's not a security secret, can you describe your alternative solution ?
 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Joost de Heer [mailto:sanguis@xs4all.nl]
> Envoyé : mercredi 12 octobre 2005 13:27
> À : Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> Cc : squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Objet : Re: [squid-users] HTTPD reverse proxy
>
> > There's no reason for squid to forward request as https, unless the
> > network
> > between squid and server is untrusted. But in such case, there's usually
> > no
> > need for using squid.
>
> I disagree. For one customer, we provide reverse proxy functionality
> (although it's not Squid). The customer is divided into smaller fractions,
> some of which don't trust the rest. So they want the internal traffic to
> go via https too.
>
> Because the backend network is a private WAN, we do need the reverse proxy
> on the DMZ to publish the site.
>
> Joost
Received on Wed Oct 12 2005 - 05:37:55 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:04 MST