Re: [squid-users] access.log equivalent for server side

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 23:47:39 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Thien Vu wrote:

> I'll take a look at it. I think it was to keep the format simpler
> because the majority of the acls are url_regexes. But I don't think
> this is the problem.

Most ofthen the situation should be the reverse, with url_regex being the
minority only used when none of all the other acl types is suitable.

> I haven't looked at how the ACLs are evaluated and if re-ordering them
> would help. Is this a worthwhile idea?

Only if you find that ACL processing is the bottleneck.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sun May 01 2005 - 15:47:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MDT