Re: [squid-users] transparent https proxy?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:32:51 +0200 (CEST)

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004, Michael Renner wrote:

> Now I thougt it's time to test a https setup. Therefore, I added one more rule
> to the firewall:
> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s ! 192.168.2.53 -p tcp --dport 443 -j
> DNAT --to 192.168.2.53:3128
>
> Even the https proxy works if the squid host is configured in the browser, it
> fails as soon it should work as a transparent proxy. I guess an additional
> configuration is required to tell squid to work as a transparent https
> proxy ... but how?

Why do you want to transparently intercept https tunnels? What is wrong
with using NAT/Masquerade?

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sun Sep 26 2004 - 10:32:56 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT