[squid-users] Cisco Router 7206 wccp connection reset with cache server

Hi everybody,

I see these messages in the gateway router all the time Normally these
messages should come only when the Cache Engines are discovered by the
router for the fist time.
gw-7206>sho log

.Sep 15 12:53:07: %WCCP-1-CACHELOST: Web Cache 0.0.0.142 lost
.Sep 15 12:53:20: %WCCP-5-CACHEFOUND: Web Cache 0.0.0.142 acquired
.Sep 15 12:55:53: %WCCP-1-CACHELOST: Web Cache 0.0.0.144 lost
.Sep 15 12:56:04: %WCCP-5-CACHEFOUND: Web Cache 0.0.0.144 acquired
.Sep 15 13:05:44: %WCCP-1-CACHELOST: Web Cache 0.0.0.144 lost
.Sep 15 13:06:02: %WCCP-5-CACHEFOUND: Web Cache 0.0.0.144 acquired
.Sep 15 13:10:12: %WCCP-1-CACHELOST: Web Cache 0.0.0.144 lost
.Sep 15 13:10:30: %WCCP-1-CACHELOST: Web Cache 0.0.0.142 lost

We are using router7206 IOS Version 12.2(12a),and All 4 cache servers have
kernel-2.4.20, squid2.5.STABLE3 and wccp version 1,running on round-robin
through the router. I am running of router7206 IOS Version 12.2(12a), .
When I trace wccp details It shows frequently connection broken(connection
time) with cache server. Due to this Net browsing is dam slow through squid
.

gw-7206>sh ip wccpweb-cache detail
WCCP Cache-Engine information:
IP Address: 0.0.0.0
Protocol Version: 0.4
State: Usable
Initial Hash Info: 00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
Assigned Hash Info: 00000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Hash Allotment: 64 (25.00%)
Packets Redirected: 16650
Connect Time: 00:01:15

IP Address: 0.0.0.0
Protocol Version: 0.4
State: Usable
Initial Hash Info: 00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
Assigned Hash Info: 00000000000000000000000000000000
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF0000000000000000
Hash Allotment: 64 (25.00%)
Packets Redirected: 26773
Connect Time: 00:01:53

All our client are complaining of slow browsing. How to trouble shoot this
problem ? I search different squid and cisco faq sites but I didnt find the
solution of this.

Any help to troubleshoot this problem will be appreciated.

Best regards,
Eswari Sharma
Received on Wed Sep 22 2004 - 06:24:40 MDT