Re: [squid-users] Hard Drive Latency

Is anyone out there running Squid with "aufs" type under heavy load with a
single IDE drive? If so what kind of stabillity does it seem to have? How
does performance compare under heavy load between "aufs" vs. "ufs" on a
single IDE drive system?

I was told "aufs" was not as stable as "ufs" and should not be used in a
production environment.

Thanks.

Matt

> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Matt wrote:
>
> >> The "aufs" cache_dir type automatically tries to do this when the
harddrive
> >> I/O load is too high.
> >
> > Is "aufs" type less stable then "ufs"?
>
> Not that I know of.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 19:33:53 MDT