Re: [squid-users] per-socket options?

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:05:13 +0200

> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>>Another possibility would be to use content filtering on one port, while
> >>>not filtering on another port, everything with one http proxy...
> >
> >On 26.08 12:29, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >>See the myport acl.
> >
> >Yes, I know about this possibility, but can I using this together with
> >forwarded_for or other options?

On 26.08 23:57, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> It can be used almost anywere where you can use acls.
>
> forwarded_for is not acl driven.

OK, so there's my question: is there a plan for (possibly) all config
directives to be acl-driven?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fucking windows! Bring Bill Gates! (Southpark the movie)
Received on Fri Aug 27 2004 - 02:05:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT