RE: [squid-users] squid sucks? ;-(

Dear RIP

This sounds interesting, Could you please share your memory usage and Squid
log file with us?

I hope we will find something.

Regards

Babar Kazmi

>From: "RIP" <rip@box43.pl>
>To: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
>Subject: [squid-users] squid sucks? ;-(
>Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:07:36 +0200
>
>Hi!
>
>Hard to bolive myself I am talking that after houngreds of hours spend on
>watching/configuring/tunning/etc squid, but here it goes..
>
>4x DSL
>1090 Kbps download max per DSL, one squid box,
>
>Configuration A
>transparent redirect to squid,
>cachemgr stats:
>Cache Misses: ~0.10000
>DNS Lookups: ~0.10000
>CPU Usage: ~10-20%
>Cache hits: ~None (cache_dir null /tmp <-- for testing)
>
>HTB limit 950Kbit per DSL
>WRR attached per DSL
>acticve users: ~50 per DSL
>
>Configuration B
>some as A but no redirection to squid
>
>1/4 clients to each DSL
>HTB limit 950Kbit per DSL
>WRR (weight round robin) attached per DSL
>users get always all avaiable bandwidth (wrr)
>
>testing procedure:
>
>www.numion.com/yourspeed (20second test)
>one computer attached to dsl1, second one to dsl2
>
>squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached
>hour computer1 computer2
>19:49 528kbps 261kbps
>19:52 594kbps 518kbps
>19:55 431kbps 575kbps
>19:59 582kbps 540kbps
>
>squid on, transparent redirection, htb wrr attached
>20:02 181 223
>20:06 187 166
>20:09 175 126
>
>squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached
>20:12 405 322
>20:16 423 286
>20:19 367 324
>
>squid on, transparent redirection, htb wrr attached
>20:23 92 126
>20:25 144 164
>20:27 200 186
>20:28 157 160
>
>squid off, users go directly (masquarade), htb wrr attached
>20:29 679 378
>20:32 542 249
>20:35 542 435
>20:39 545 216
>20:42 309 537
>20:45 471 350
>
>average fps squid on, computer1: 164kbps
>average fps squid off, computer1: 493kbps
>
>some one can explan this?
>some one can do test to confirm/negate that?
>
>regards.
>
>--RIP--
>
Received on Tue Aug 17 2004 - 23:47:12 MDT