On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Andriy Korud wrote:
> cache_dir diskd /cache1/squid 31000 38 256
> cache_dir diskd /cache2/squid 31000 38 256
1GB of RAM is cutting it close for a full 62GB cache. 2GB RAM would
be much better in that situation. My cache is currently 26GB holding
about 2.1 million objects, which is not even half the total size of
your cache, and Squid is using 380MB of RAM. That means your cache
will see at _least_ twice the memory usage of Squid, or at least
760MB. If you need performance more than hit ratio, I would
definately suggest reducing the cache size.
-- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - x86-64, PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?Received on Fri Dec 05 2003 - 12:58:32 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:06 MST