Re: [squid-users] Slow / Fast response from squid

From: Philip Choy <plchoy@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:12:39 +0800

Thank you for your suggestion..

I was using default Red Hat supplied squid 2.5 STABLE1. And, I was trying
out small cache of 100Mb on reiserfs-type parition. It had same problems.
After i download the source of current squid 2.5 STABLE4, and compile it and
use it with same configuration settings, the impact is BIG.

Visibly fast response time.

Thanx.

Phil.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>
To: "Philip Choy" <plchoy@perwinkle.income.com.sg>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Slow / Fast response from squid

> > RHL 9.0
> > squid 2.5.1
>
> Ok, but if you are installing a new Squid why are you not using the
> current STABLE version?
>
> > /var/spool/squid mounted as default ext3 on 1 logical vol of phy vol
group
> > of 4 RAID-0 SCSI disks of 20GB.
>
> Ok, but it is easier to adminstrate if you mount each drive spindle
> separately, and refer to them by separate cache_dir lines.
Received on Thu Nov 20 2003 - 02:12:40 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:24 MST