On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, ads squid wrote:
> As observed, Squid 3.0 is in development stage.
Indeed.
> Is it safe to use Squid 3.0?
Define safe.
Squid-3 is not yet as stable as Squid-2.5.
> When can I expect producion version of 3.0
When the developers are satisfied with the quality of Squid-3.0, which
includes getting feedback from users..
> As adviced, if it is going to solve all problems, I
> would like to go for it.
It does not solve all problems, but it does make setting up accelerators a
lot easier, especially if there is authentication at the accelerator level
involved.
> I think compiling and configuration part should be
> identical to Squid 2.5
compiling is identical, configuration is slightly different, especially so
in accelerator setups. See the release notes for a quick guide on the
differences if you are familiar with your Squid-2.5 configuration, or just
use the squid.conf.default comments if you are making a new configuration
without basing it on a prior Squid-2.5 setup.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Sep 15 2003 - 08:25:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:19:53 MST