ons 2003-07-23 klockan 19.48 skrev Paul.Fiero@ci.austin.tx.us:
> I have heard that it would be preferrable to set up the cache storage area
> on a RAID 5 set using high speed ultra SCSI drives and a caching
> controller. Does this sound right?
The exact opposite.
Squid cache workload is THE worst case scenario for a RAID5 system. It
is hard to find any worse real life workload for RAID5 than Squid cache.
If you want to raid your cache then use mirroring, not RAID5. If you are
today considering 3 drives RAID5 then I would recommend considering 2+2
drives (4 drives) in mirror setup in two separate mirrors (no
concat/striping).
Regards
Henrik
-- Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful. https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org Please consult the Squid FAQ and other available documentation before asking Squid questions, and use the squid-users mailing-list when no answer can be found. Private support questions is only answered for a fee or as part of a commercial Squid support contract. If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid and firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.comReceived on Wed Jul 23 2003 - 12:30:33 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:18:15 MST