Re: [squid-users] Squid being slow more than a direct connection

On Sunday 25 May 2003 00.04, Mauro wrote:

> So in general it's better to use diskd or aufs?
> I am using ufs.

If you are having a low load on your Squid (<30 requests/s) then ufs
is often faster than diskd/aufs, but it cannot handle by far as high
load as diskd or aufs. In Squid versions prior to 2.5.STABLE2 this
was very noticeable on aufs where performance of cache hits sometimes
was very slow unless there was many other requests at the same time..

Regards
Henrik

-- 
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org
If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, info@marasystems.com