Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> 
> #       "ufs" is the old well-known Squid storage format that has always
> #       been there.
> #       cache_dir ufs Directory-Name Mbytes L1 L2 [options]
> #
> #       "aufs" uses the same storage format as "ufs", utilizing
> #       POSIX-threads to avoid blocking the main Squid process on
> #       disk-I/O. This was formerly known in Squid as async-io.
> #       cache_dir aufs Directory-Name Mbytes L1 L2 [options]
> #
> #       The diskd store type:
> #       "diskd" uses the same storage format as "ufs", utilizing a
> #       separate process to avoid blocking the main Squid process on
> #       disk-I/O.
> #       cache_dir diskd Directory-Name Mbytes L1 L2 [options] [Q1=n] [Q2=n]
> 
> Above is from squid.conf.default (obviously).
> 
> I understand the difference, but what should I actually use?
> (now I remain with ufs).
> 
> Which Linux filesystems are better for storage
> (I suspect Reiserfs is good for size reasons)?
> 
> What are rules of thumb for L1 L2 parameters?
> 
> Maybe I just need to be pointed to an URL? ;)
> --
> vda
 Not responding directly , but you also may want to go
 through the archives.
 These matters have been discussed extensively already.
 M.
-- 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM (M.E. Mar 2002)Received on Fri Jan 10 2003 - 02:02:26 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:36 MST