Re: [squid-users] Raid 0 vs Multiple stores.

From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 09:11:38 +1000

On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:10:53 +0200
Rabie van der Merwe <Rvdmerwe@mhg.co.za> wrote:

> If I have a box with the OS on a disk, and I
> have to choose between running 4 disk on a
> separate SCSI channel and running a store on
> each disk vs a RAID controller with a battery
> backed up cache running also 4 disks striped
> with write-back caching enabled, in my mind
> the raid controller should be the faster option?

There's little point striping the disks cos squid will stripe for you anyway.
Besides, if you lose one disk you lose the entire cache. Squid can keep going if
it loses a "cache_dir". If ths suarts you thinking about RAID-5, don't. Squid
provides the worst-case load for RAID-5 making it far worse than individual
disks.

Colin

--
Colin Campbell
Unix Support/Postmaster/Hostmaster
CITEC
+61 7 3227 6334
Received on Thu Nov 28 2002 - 16:11:49 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:11:38 MST