Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly

Henrik!

Didn't Joe Cooper ran some test comparing DiskD with Aufs and so on,
with DD coming slightly on top?

I have personally find, without testing, just "feeling", a slight
performance when using DD. I have been using DD for over 2 years now.

Edward

-----Original Message-----
From: "Andrian" <beruangkece@hotpop.com>
To: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@squid-cache.org>, "Edward D. Millington"
<edward@cariaccess.com>
Cc: "Squid Users" <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:57:09 +0700
Subject: Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly

> About aufs, I'm installing new squid2.-stable1, with defaul command
> on
> config
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/squid
> make all
> make install
>
> Now, Why I can change to aufs on cache_dir? is it because how i
> configure?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Andrian
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
> To: Edward D. Millington <edward@cariaccess.com>
> Cc: Squid Users <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly
>
>
> > aufs is fastest on Linux, but diskd can do a pretty good job as
> well.
> >
> > diskd is fastest on FreeBSD. aufs do not work good at all on
> FreeBSD.
> >
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> >
> > tor 2002-11-07 klockan 16.34 skrev Edward D. Millington:
> > > Hi Henrik!
> > >
> > > I thought that DiskD was the fastest of all 3 fs on Linux.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Edward Millington
> > > BSc, Network+, I-Net+, CIW Associate
> > > Systems Administrator, Sr
> > > Cariaccess Communications Ltd.
> > > Palm Plaza
> > > Wildey
> > > St. Michael
> > > Barbados
> > >
> > > Phone: 1 246 430 7435
> > > Mobile: 1 246 234 6278
> > > Fax: 1 246 431 0170
> > >
> > > edward@cariaccess.com
> > > www.cariaccess.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org>
> > > To: Fabien Salvi <fabien@cri74.org>
> > > Cc: Squid User <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> > > Date: 07 Nov 2002 16:01:53 +0100
> > > Subject: Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly
> > >
> > > > You might want to consider trying the aufs cache_dir type.
> Generally
> > > > faster than diskd on Linux and less configuration needed.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Henrik
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > tor 2002-11-07 klockan 11.42 skrev Fabien Salvi:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using squid 2.4.STABLE6 on linux (Debian woody) with
> kernel
> > > > 2.4.19
> > > > > SMP
> > > > > Server is a dual PIII 1Ghz with 1GB RAM and ICP-Vortex RAID
> card
> > > > and
> > > > > U160 36GB SCSI IBM hard disks.
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tried ufs and diskd cache_dir.
> >
> >
Received on Fri Nov 08 2002 - 04:10:19 MST