Re: [squid-users] diskd performs badly

Fabien Salvi wrote:
>
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >
> > You might want to consider trying the aufs cache_dir type. Generally
> > faster than diskd on Linux and less configuration needed.
> >
>
> Thanks for your help...
> I was thinking about that, but like it's said "Async IO support may
> bebuggy, however, so beware.", I was not sure it was a good choice.
> Is it still buggy ?
>
> For the moment, our old proxy server with squid 2.3.4 support up to 50
> req/s...

I've just tried aufs, but I obtain same bad perfs as diskd, aroud 200
KB/s

But, maybe aufs or diskd support better high load (> 60 req/s) than ufs
while throughput stay low...

-- 
Fabien SALVI      Centre de Ressources Informatiques
                  Archamps, France -- http://www.cri74.org
                  PingOO GNU/linux distribution : http://www.pingoo.org