Joe Cooper wrote:
> For example, don't do Squid 3 -> Squid 2 -> Squid 1 -> Internet. This
> is a badly implemented cache topology, and latency will suffer because
> of it.
Henrik Nordström wrote:
>
> In a sibling relation the request will only be sent to the sibling if the
> sibling claims it has the response cached.
>
> In a parent relation the request is always sent there, assuming the parent
> will find the requested data if not available in it's cache.
Given a star of decent speed WAN links which are not saturated and
cache servers at both the remote as well as central locations, it
seems that using a sibling relationship, rather than parent/child
is being recommended.
As this feels counterintuitive, I'm just looking for confirmation.
/\/\ \/\/
Received on Wed May 29 2002 - 10:35:32 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:08:15 MST