Yes.
IIRC it is even documented somewhere (maybe the FAQ) that if you want to use
cache-digets without fallback on ICP on digest misses then you need to use
the no-query option..
Regards
Henrik
Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> > Hmm.. the trace seems to suggest the error is in cache
> > digests.. but cache
> > digests take place regardless of no-query.. so I am a bit
> > confused.. if it
> > was digests then one would think the error should always occur..
>
> This is good to know. Can you confirm that with no-query enabled
> cache digests are nonetheless exchanged and used?
> It's not documented anywhere that I could find so far.
> (this with 2.5PRE, not HEAD)
>
> Thanks lots.
Received on Wed May 08 2002 - 10:03:24 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:08:03 MST