There is no benefit to using multiple cache_dir entries for a single 
disk (diskd may be a possible exception to this).  If you have multiple 
real disks, then there is a benefit to using them, of course.
hari_bhr wrote:
> hi all gurus
> 
> is there any difference, between one disk large for cache
> or different
> 
> i have two setup 
> one 
> 
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache1 3000 16 256
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache2 4000 16 256
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache3 4000 16 256
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache4 4000 16 256
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache5 4000 16 256
> 
> two
> cache_dir ufs /var/spool/squid/cache1 12000 16 256
> 
> but i see the second serve greate
> 
> can some one recomend me what is the best
> iam using RPM
-- Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com> http://www.swelltech.com Web Caching Appliances and SupportReceived on Sat Nov 17 2001 - 08:43:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:17 MST