On Tue, 2001-09-11 at 03:09, Joe Cooper wrote:
> time-hack almost certainly is the problem. This has come up about five
> times in the past couple of months (CPU problems), and I think every
> time it's been due to the time-hack.
>
> Maybe there should be a warning label on this option? Or it should go
> away or be fixed? Is anyone using it for its intended purpose (and what
> is its intended purpose, by the way)?
I'm not sure without checking the code :] but the name "Time-hack" is a
bit of a giveaway as to it's status.
Rob
Received on Tue Sep 11 2001 - 08:08:52 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:08 MST