Nothing wrong with a Squid process of 180MB.
(If read a little further into the archives you will have come upon much
discussion of the expected process size for Squid given certain
variables, like size of the object store, cache_mem value, etc.)
khiz code wrote:
> hi all
> me again .. sorry
> i ve been running squid fo rthe last 3 days
> http req/sec = 20
>
> the squid process is abt 180 MB
> free -m shows me
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 505 502 2 11 168 66
> -/+ buffers/cache: 267 237
> Swap: 4000 0 4000
>
> i got cache_dir of 12 GB distributed across 4 drives
> as 3 GB each
> cache_mem 100 MB
> compaq prolinea 512 MB ram
>
> is this process size okay ...
> the shared buffer column keeps on increasing
> shud i expect swapping in the next few days ???
> any preventive measures
> coz going by the past posts on the list cache_mem of
> 100 mB is abt okay for 512 MB ram..
> i only got squid as the main process on th emachine
> pls do reply back
> rgds
> khizcode
--
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
http://www.swelltech.com
Received on Mon Sep 10 2001 - 10:49:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:07 MST