Re: [squid-users] Are "no_cache deny" and "http_access deny" redundant?

On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Steve Snyder wrote:

> Suppose I have this acl defined:
>
> acl blockme dstdomain .blockme.com
>
> and these lines in squid.conf (v2.4S2):
>
> no_cache deny blockme
> http_access deny blockme
>
> Are these last 2 lines redundant? More precisely, does that "http_access
> deny" render the "no_cache deny" useless?

Steve,

you got it. since "blockme" URLs are denied, there is no need
for the no_cache rule.
Received on Fri Sep 07 2001 - 11:41:42 MDT