[squid-users] ufs/aufs/diskd question

Hi all,
I am new to squid. We are running a mixed environment (m.s. proxy and
squid) and are migrating to squid. In reading the documentation and faq, I
still have a question. Which is better/faster/more reliable, aufs or
diskd???

hardware: dell poweredge 4400
os: redhat 7.1
Server is running the "out-of-the-box" enterprise smp kernel.

squid 2.4.STABLE1
squidGuard 1.1.4

Cache is actually up and running in production. Concept proven, migration
begins. That was using diskd. I am seeing many many posts here using aufs,
am I missing out?

Thanks!
Cecil
Received on Tue Sep 04 2001 - 07:58:17 MDT