Re: [squid-users] ## Problem with delay pools ##

From: Mike Kiernan <mkiernan@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 09:04:48 +0200

Unless I'm going bonkers %~), all you've done here
is replaced 'network_1' with 'network_2'
in every pool - is this another typo????
As I said - network_2 (in this example you've
just sent) would be caught by delay pool 1;
the other 2 stanzas would be ignored, but
there's also a syntax error too.

Suggest you try something like the stanza
I sent [actually there was a couple of
typos in that too :) ] - here it is (corrected!):

> delay class 1 2
> delay_parameters 1 5000/150000 5000/120000
> delay_access 1 allow network_1
> delay_access 1 allow network_1_ftypes
>
> delay class 2 2
> delay_parameters 2 5000/150000 5000/120000
> delay_access 2 allow network_2
> delay_access 2 allow network_2_ftypes
>
> and so on

[note syntax - you need the pool number after
delay_parameters and delay_access]

You're best off trying with one pool at a time
and using the cachemgr.cgi and wget to check
it's working properly before you add the next
one.

If it's not clear let me know...

cheers,
Mike

> Hi. Thanks for the Message.
> It was a typo.
> The configuration is as followes :
>
> # ==== 1 ====
> > delay_class 1 2
> > delay_parameters 5000/150000 5000/120000
> > delay_access 1 allow network_2
> > # ==== 1 ====
> >
> > # ==== 2 ====
> > delay_class 2 2
> > delay_parameters 5000/150000 5000/120000
> > delay_access 1 allow network_2
> > # ==== 2 ====
> >
> > # ==== 3 ====
> > delay_class 3 2
> > delay_parameters 5000/150000 5000/120000
> > delay_access 1 allow network_2
> > # ==== 3 ====
>
> So is this incorrect, or should I do what you told me. :=)
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Svavar
>

-- 
Michael Kiernan
Onet.pl S.A.
Krakow, Poland
http://www.onet.pl/
Received on Mon Sep 03 2001 - 01:04:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:02:01 MST