>
> > > there a similar performance consideration for the ReiserFS file system?
> >
> > NO. in reiserfs doing something like 1 4096 is even better.
>
> Not unless reiserfs has seriously improved per-directory locking. See
> post from Joe.
i see but when i've used reiserfs i've never have such condition. does it
show under heavy load only or with asyncufs only (i was using ufs)
> > > If it matters, this a SMP Linux v2.4.x system running Squid 2.4STABLE1
> > > with aufs file access.
> > squid will not use much more than one CPU.
>
> But a second CPU will improve things, probably more so on Linux-2.4.
could be used a little for everything else (IP handling, disk ops). i
don't think it could be more than 10-20% of other CPU
Received on Wed May 23 2001 - 11:54:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:00:16 MST