On the LAN, everything is working good.
but for the SAT, some pages are load.
What could be causing this problems?
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Edward Millington
(Network Administrator & Senior Technical Support Technician)
Cariaccess Communications Ltd.
Wildey
St. Michael
Barbados
1-246-430-7435
Fax : 1-246-431-0170
www.cariaccess.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: <mcnatton@mindspring.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Netscape to Squid conversion Issues
> Set up an apache server serving the PAC file, and then use the
> httpd_accel_host directive to tell Squid to forward HTTP server requests
> to this server.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid Hacker
>
>
> mcnatton@mindspring.com wrote:
> >
> > Here's a situation we're facing and I'm curious if anyone has some
> > insight into how we might approach this problem.
> >
> > We currently have approximately 10,000 pcs, a very large portion of
> > which are configured in one of two ways.
> >
> > A. Netscape browsers with manual proxy servers set up for http and
> > https as proxy.host.net:8080
> > B. Netscape browsers with automatic proxy configuration with URL
> > setup as proxy.host.net:8080 (note they're the same).
> >
> > We're also in the process of changing from netscape admin-server and
> > netscape proxy server to apache and squid version 2.3.STABLE4 with
> > smartfilter extensions. All of this is running on Solaris 2.7.
> >
> > This setup runs fine when pointing to the netscape admin-server/proxy
> > server configuration.
> >
> > The problem I'm having is when I point one of the "automatic"
> > configured pcs to one of the boxes running SQUID. At startup, the
> > user receives a message saying the automatic configuration has failed
> > and on the squid server I see the following access.log entry.
> >
> > 10.49.0.145 - - [30/Apr/2001:16:28:40 -0400] "GET / HTTP/0.0" 400 1094
> > NONE:NONE
> >
> > >From the docs, it's clear that I need to provide a proxy.pac file
> > telling the users what their automatic configuration should be. The
> > problem I'm having is how to provide this info and provide
> > filtering/caching all from the same port?
> >
> > Having all the users change their configuration to point to another
> > port or host isn't an attractive option (120+ sites, 6000 pcs likely
> > to be touched). If I must do that, I'd much prefer to cut over to
> > transparent proxying so we don't face this problem again in the
> > future and it's trivial for the end users to reconfigure.
> >
> > Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -- steve
>
>
Received on Tue May 01 2001 - 11:46:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:46 MST