[squid-users] aufs or diskd for HP-UX 11.11?

We're about to switch our cache engine from 2.3.STABLE4 under HP-UX 10.20
to 2.4.STABLE1 under HP-UX 11.11. Has anyone compared the performance
of using ufs, aufs, or diskd under HP-UX 11.11? We'll need to handle at least
60 requests a second. I have multiple disks for the cache area.

Mike Mitchell
SAS Institute Inc. The power to know
Mike.Mitchell@sas.com
(919) 677-8000 x16793
Received on Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:38:41 MDT