Re: [SQU] Squid Performance

At 18:54 26/02/01 +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>Martin A. Brooks wrote:
>
> > IMHO, 2.4 is not yet stable enough to be used on production systems. Hell,
> > even 2.2 is still a bit flaky :)
>
>I find Linux 2.4 to be quite stable, when you find the suitable hardware
>to run it on.. (still problems with certain very common network card
>drivers, certain SCSI boards and such never-ending issues...)

It's a matter of trust. I don't trust 2.4.x on anything I care about, I
don't trust 2.2.x on anything I have less than 6 months of solid experience
of or anything I'm likely to be woken up in the middle of the night to sort
out. I stick 2.0.39 on everything else. YMMV.

Regards

Martin A. Brooks
------------------------------------------------------
If Windows NT were an animal, it'd be a fainting goat.

Linux counter #60974 - so ner!

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html