RE: [SQU] Secure Authentication

By all means and to the best of my ability. (New job so I've got my head
down a bit at the moment).

From a Linux user's (my) point of view this kind of development is highly
significant as it allows further integration into the modern office. It
makes it much easier to be able to select the best tool for the job rather
than having to make do with compromises.
Plus the MS Proxy here crashes on a daily basis - which prior to my arrival
had been taken for granted... Hee Hee. #1 was to log into the proxy in my
previous company and show them the uptime..

Keep up the good work,

Toby.

 -----Original Message-----
From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) [mailto:ChemolliF@GruppoCredit.it]
Sent: 08 September 2000 16:15
To: 'Ounsted, Toby'; squid-users@ircache.net
Subject: RE: [SQU] Secure Authentication

> Can anyone give an update on how well the NTLM stuff is
> going? I read the
> announcement at the end of August about it's availability but
> have held back
> whilst it's classified as 'development' rather than
> 'production'. I ran
> Squid very happily in my previous job but have had to hold
> back so far in
> this one as NT Authentication is a prerequisite for a proxy
> service (Bah!).

It won't be moved to production or any
semblance of it until we get also somebody else
testing it.

Are you willing to help us debug it?

Your message is the first sign that anybody
cares for what we did, we were fearing that
our work had gone to the bit bucket...

-- 
	/kinkie
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html