Re: no caching for sites with framesets..

Duane,

> > Hi,
> >
> > Running squid on linux no probs, except for this one i can't work out:
> >
> > acl BLAH dst www.logosafe.com.au
> > no_cache deny BLAH
> >
> > Seems fair enough yes? It all works, except for the fact that this site
is
> > based on frames and .swf files and all other funky stuff.
> >
> > This is a tail of my access.log when i go to the www.logosafe.com.au
> > webpage:
> >
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 192 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/ - NONE/- text/html
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 192 GET
http://www.logosafe.com.au/frame_bannerindex.html -
> > NONE/- text/html
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 192 GET
http://www.logosafe.com.au/frame_mainindex.html -
> > NONE/- text/html
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 192 GET
http://www.logosafe.com.au/graphix/Getflash.gif -
> > NONE/- image/gif
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 207 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/intro.swf - NONE/-
> > application/octet-stream
> > TCP_MISS/304 212 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/frameset.html -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_MISS/304 212 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/frame_left.html -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 207 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/logo.swf -
> > NONE/-application/octet-stream
> > TCP_MISS/304 212 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/topbuthome.html -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_MISS/304 212 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/frame_mid.html -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_MISS/304 212 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/home.html -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_MISS/304 211 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/music.swf -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> > TCP_IMS_HIT/304 207 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/topbuthome.swf -
NONE/-
> > application/octet-stream
> > TCP_MISS/304 210 GET http://www.logosafe.com.au/graphix/home.jpg -
> > DIRECT/www.logosafe.com.au -
> >
> > Am i missing something here? I don't want the proxy to HIT for any of
the
> > pages!
> >
> > Perhaps it has something to do with the TCP_IMS_HIT? I just can't find
any
> > webpage that tells me what that means :-]
>
> Could it be that the objects already got cached before you added the
> 'no_cache' rule?

Nope, the rule has been in there for ages..

Regards,

Marc-Adrian Napoli
Network Administrator
Connect Infobahn Australia
+61 2 9281 1750
Received on Tue May 09 2000 - 20:36:17 MDT