And lets also recall that the user had _not_ read the bugs page or 
obviously done any investigation into this version of squid.  His original 
problem related to why --enable-heap-replacement did not work, which is 
documented at:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.4/bugs/
Namely:  "Heap-based replacement will not compile."
One would surely hope that a user or system administrator would look at the 
bugs page before implementing any version of any software.  Would _you_ 
ever use software which had bugs which were critical and could completely 
disable the software under certain circumstances?
reuben
At Tuesday 07:17 AM 25/04/2000 -0500, Russell Mosemann wrote:
> >From the same page where you found the description of squid-users, there
>is this description of squid-dev:
>
>"This small list is used for general discussions relating to Squid
>  development. This includes ideas for new features, issues, etc."
>
>I don't believe that the people asking the questions are interested in the
>development of Squid, submitting ideas for new features or are reporting
>problem issues.  They are interested in getting the software running.
>That makes squid-users an appropriate forum for such discussions.
>                  ^^^^^
>
>If there are development-related problems, surely they should be directed
>to squid-dev. However, just because a version of Squid has DEVEL in it's
>name doesn't mean that no questions can be asked about its configuration
>or its operation.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Reuben Farrelly          West Ryde, NSW 2114,       Australia
Received on Tue Apr 25 2000 - 06:56:47 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:53:02 MST