Re: Round-robin and ACL priority ?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 09:09:27 +0100

¤ý²Ð¦t wrote:

> Dose Round-Robin parameter has higher priority than ACL list ??

No, but your acl lists did not exclude p1 & p2 for the requests that
should be sent to p3 / p4.

round-robin has a higher priority than no sheduling at all.

The peer selection priority are

1. digest hit
2. first ICP hit
3. closest ICP miss
4. default parent
5. round-robin parent
6. first alive parent

cache_peer_access can be used to exclude peers from the selection.

What you can do in this case is to mark p3 & p4 as default. It will
cause them to get higher priority than round-robin for requests that are
allowed to be sent to them.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker
Received on Wed Jan 05 2000 - 01:21:20 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:14 MST