Hi,
I was looking yesterday the home page of "Cache Flow" I know is a commercial cache solution but they have now implemented wccp v2.0 and I was wondering if they did it that means Cisco opened the license? (http://www.cacheflow.com/news/press/cacheos2.1.html)
Sandra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Henrik Nordstrom [SMTP:hno@hem.passagen.se]
Enviado el: Lunes 27 de Diciembre de 1999 06:18 PM
Para: Sandra Jaque
CC: 'squid-users@ircache.net'
Asunto: Re: wccp with a L4 switch
Sandra Jaque wrote:
> Iīm evaluating a cache server solution, and I was trying squid
> in a linux box with wccp in a 7200 router working quite well, but
> how wccp v1.0 talk with just one squid box at a time I was wondering
> what happend if I put a L4 switch to load balance between more
> than one squid box (one of them talking wccp and having a hierarchy
> relation with the other squid box) should this work fine?
Not without modification.
> my doubt is because of the GRE encapsulation, I donīt know if
> the switch should be able to send the traffic to the squid boxes
> based on the http port?.
Most likely not, but the idea is interesting.
What could be done in a practical manner is to build a Linux "L4 switch"
announcing itself to the router using WCCP and distributing the sessions
to your cache boxes.
Another option is to build a Linux "router" which performs WCCP
announcements and GRE decapsulation and then forwards the TCP/IP packet
to your favorite L4 switch for distribution.
The announcement protocol of WCCP v1 is quite trivial to implement it is
is for one WCCP node only.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Tue Dec 28 1999 - 05:55:54 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:07 MST