Clifton Royston wrote:
> The biggest advantage of switches/routers over servers is: no moving
> parts, so they don't go down because a hard disk failed. The second
> one is (somewhat) simpler software because they're doing a more limited
> list of things. (A third is that they reboot a lot faster.) Overall I
> tend to figure downtime for servers will be about 1 order of magnitude
> higher over the course of a year, than for a reasonable router or smart
> switch.
And the biggest disadvantage is that few if any of them correcly
implements all aspects of TCP/IP when used as a TCP load balancer. They
work most of the time, but some users may experience strange problems
due to various incompabilities in TCP options or ICMP processing.
And, the code and/or silicone in these beasts are fairly young compared
to most routers or OS:es.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hackerReceived on Tue Dec 21 1999 - 18:15:27 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:50:04 MST