On Fri, Dec 10, 1999, Jens-S. Voeckler wrote:
> Anyway, I fiddled a little with my PCI-HW-RAID (the drives look to the
> kernel like pure disks) and UFS logging:
>
> 1) Yes, for plain linear write, UFS logging seems to improve performance.
> 2) No, for linear writes with 10 % random reads, UFS logging is not
> makeing too much of a difference. This is what I estimated as squid
> behaviour with a fresh cache.
> 3) No, for random writes with 10 % random reads, UFS logging is actually
> slowing you down. This is a rough estimation for a squid runinng a few
> weeks (granted, a real squid would have a lot more reads).
I tried UFS logging on a group of UE's here, and they caused the servers
to spiral into a steaming heap after a short while. Did Sun stick the UFS
log at the beginning of the disk, or did they distribute it out alongside
each cylinder group?
Adrian
-- Adrian Chadd Systems Engineer <adrian@ip.versatel.net> Versatel Telecom BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands "Music in the soul can be heard by the universe" - Lao TsuReceived on Fri Dec 10 1999 - 04:36:32 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:49:49 MST