Re: More evidence of a possible memory leak in 2.2-STABLE-2 ?

At Tuesday 18/05/99 04:50 PM +0100, you wrote:

>As if to confirm Henrik's suspicion of a memory leak in 2.2STABLE-2
><>
>Any comments?

Not about the above statements (I can't be sure about leaks), but it sure
looks like you could do with a _lot_ more disk space. Your LRU is down to
0.27 days...see below...and your cache is not getting great hit rates...

>=======================================
>
>Cache Manager menu
>
>
>Squid Object Cache: Version 2.2.STABLE2
>
> Start Time:
> Fri, 14 May 1999 16:04:21 GMT
> Current Time:
> Tue, 18 May 1999 15:44:35 GMT
>
>
>Connection information for squid:
> Number of clients accessing cache: 386
> Number of HTTP requests received: 354954
> Number of ICP messages received: 0
> Number of ICP messages sent: 0
> Number of queued ICP replies: 0
> Request failure ratio: 0.00%
> HTTP requests per minute: 61.8
> ICP messages per minute: 0.0
> Select loop called: 5437514 times, 63.340 ms avg
>Cache information for squid:
> Request Hit Ratios: 5min: 9.8%, 60min: 20.2%
> Byte Hit Ratios: 5min: 10.0%, 60min: 14.7%
> Storage Swap size: 189936 KB
> Storage Mem size: 32788 KB
> Storage LRU Expiration Age: 0.27 days
> Mean Object Size: 6.59 KB
> Requests given to unlinkd: 115620
Received on Tue May 18 1999 - 11:14:02 MDT