Miguel Bazzano wrote:
> Is this for sure, that means that my SQUID is unable to handle ICP requests
> now?
No, Squid will continue to answer ICP requests, but it won't be able to
have neighbours or parents other than CARP distributed parents.
One-way child caches is thus unaffected (caches using you as a parent
but your cache is not using them as siblings)
> Could you explain this further I am completely lost here, could you post an
> example of such a table.
See the CARP internet-draft document (if you can find it.. the draft has
expired and has been removed from all official mirrors.. try searching
for draft-vinod-carp)
> Like I told you I do not know much about SQUID, I knew how to make SQUID
> connect through a MSPROXY, however I could not make a MSPROXY 2.0 server
> connect to a SQUID box, no matter what I tried, however compiling SQUID
> with --enable-carp allowed me to do just that (i.e.:I could tell MSPROXY to
> use my SQUID parent for its connections), whereas before MSPROXY would try
> to contanct SQUID whithout success.
I strongly suspects that if you recompile Squid without CARP support and
replaces your Squid binary with this new binary without CARP, then the
MSPROXY child caches will continue to use Squid as they do today. There
is not a single difference in how child caches are handled when
--enable-carp is used or not.
-- Henrik Nordstrom Spare time Squid hackerReceived on Sat May 15 1999 - 13:30:35 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:18 MST