Knut A. Syed wrote:
> Port 81 was actually just one example. Todays log contains at least
> these ports: 81, 82, 90, 180, 1010, 1024.
>
> In what way would it be unsafe to accept all ports?
Because in the past hackers have abused HTTP proxies to hide their
identity when contacting all kinds of TCP/IP services (telnet, SMTP, IRC
and a lot of other non-HTTP services)
Besides, most HTTP servers on non-common ports >1024 are rouge servers
anyway, usually carrying questionable material.
-- Henrik NordstromReceived on Wed May 12 1999 - 16:56:56 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:16 MST