Re: is this correct?

From: TFC WLAN 97/98 - IST - ext.2269 (8418269) <wlan@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:24:13 +0100 (WEST)

Yes, I have the same problem. It seems that Squid
simply ignores the "parent" configuration without telling
what's going on, and goes DIRECT most of the times. Even
without using ICP.

The trick of using a "never_direct" access list for "all" seems to
work. But if the parent cache does go down, then what?

On Wed, 5 May 1999, ZioBudda wrote:

> Hi, I have set one proxy server parent, And when I prove it in the child
> squid/access.log file I see:
> 925914927.931 1773 212.29.130.26 TCP_MISS/200 10236 GET
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html -
> FIRST_PARENT_MISS/proxy.enter.it text/html
> 925914928.462 1142 212.29.130.26 TCP_MISS/200 6437 GET
> http://www.gnu.org/graphics/philosophical-gnu-sm.jpg -
> TIMEOUT_DIRECT/www.gnu.org image/jpeg
>
> is this ok or my configuration does not works?
>
> I use it under RedHat 5.2, squid 2.2Stable2 (recompile it myself...)
>
> "Non è importante che tu sia crotalo o pavone, l'importante è che
> se tu muori me lo dici prima". (Cèlv)
> --
> Michel <ZioBudda> Morelli michel@michel.enter.it
> http://ziobudda.enter.it
> Problemi con Linux ? mailto:linux@saturn.media.dsi.unimi.it
>
Received on Wed May 05 1999 - 11:20:01 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:46:14 MST