>>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 12:22:22 +0100, Ole Moller <olm@cybercity.dk> said:
 > I still dont see the point. The issue is whether or not the script gives
 > the same output given the same input at a later point in time. Even though
 > you are right that words like 'sex' tends to be often used when querying
 > search-engines, there are no way a cache can know that the output wont be
 > changed due to adding or deleting of urls in the database, conditioning
 > formatting of output depending on the browser used and so on.
 > Since this is the case in 99% of the urls including a question mark I will
 > keep my squid.conf as it is - rather than pollution my cache with 99% junk
 > just to respect (your) 1% cache-friendly urls.
I will no longer try to convince you, because most probably you are
right for 99% of the dirty CGI programs out there. But maybe you are
not, because 99% of the CGI programmers do not know how to write a
meaningful Last-Modified and Expires header.
I have realized that I'm in the classical statistical discrimination
situation and I have to masquerade to get out if it.
 > I would suggest [...suggestions how to remedy my situation left out...]
Thanks for the suggestions, but my first posting was already a pretty
complete solution to the problem from my point of view. Please let me
repeat (this is a mod_perl PerlPostReadRequestHandler):
  sub handler {
    my($r) = @_;
    my $uri = $r->uri;
    if ( $uri !~ /\?/ && $uri =~ /(.+?);(.*)/ ) {
      my($u1,$u2) = ($1, $2);
      $u2 =~ s/\.htm//;
      $r->uri($u1);
      $r->args($u2);
    }
    DECLINED;
  }
This snippet replaces the first semicolon in a Non-Query with a
question mark and turns it into a query for the next handler. Problem
solved.
 > Before you do that I still think that you should consider what the
 > likelihood is that the same 'page' will be shown twice within your
 > expire-time. If it is unlikely I dont think it is cache-friendly to make
 > every cache in the world cache a copy of your 'page' just because it is
 > possible.
Good point. But that's a job a good cache server has to do in general.
I have a few tiles that are served several million times per year. A
good cache server should have them. BTW, if you're interested in the
server, it is http://www.stadtplandienst.de.
Thanks for your interest,
-- andreasReceived on Tue Mar 02 1999 - 06:47:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:45:06 MST