On Oct 4, 2:33pm, Alex Rousskov (possibly) wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Oct 1998, Allen Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi. What's the feasibility of adapting the header rewriting code for
> > Squid 1.1.x to Squid 2.0? It would be desirable to have this prior to
> > the httpProcessReplyHeader call(s), so that it could change whether or
> > not stuff was considered to be cacheable (such as via removing
> > selected cookies).
>
> AFAIK, cookies are no longer a problem in Squid 2.0. Objects with cookies
> do get cached. Cookies are stripped out on HITs. If I recall right, this
> behavior is even compliant with HTTP.
Hmm... this could cause problems in some circumstances; possibly a
configuration option could introduce a switch for whether or not
cookies were considered to make an object uncacheable? I'd also like
to specifically eliminate cookies from some commercial sites (e.g.,
doubleclick), ones for non-text pages, and ones not specific to the
host from which the cookie came; this is to reduce spam directed at
our users.
-Allen
-- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.eduReceived on Thu Oct 15 1998 - 14:23:50 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:42:31 MST