> Unfortunately, I can't say what's happening off my local network,
> but the stalled transfers are more obvious with squid than the
> existing Netscape proxy. Even the data transfer rates are low
> (often < 3kb/s - alternatively, via the Netscape proxy > 50kb/s
> is typical).
Yes. Stalled transfers should be more obvious when using Squid than
other proxies. The difference is that Squid reuses ongoing requests for
the same object, while most other (including Netscape) always starts a
new request for the object.
This would suggest that a stalled request keeps stalling while a new
request gets served. Why then would you want to have reuse of ongoing
requests?
Has anybody looked at the likelyhood that an ongoing request gets reused?
Carlos
Received on Mon Aug 10 1998 - 12:28:21 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:28 MST